From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 29 20:35:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB7F1065670; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alson+ml@alm.flutnet.org) Received: from tafi.alm.flutnet.org (tafi.dsl.alm.flutnet.org [145.99.245.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C088FC12; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alson+ml@alm.flutnet.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tafi.alm.flutnet.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC2878C25; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:35:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at alm.flutnet.org Received: from tafi.alm.flutnet.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tafi.alm.flutnet.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B2XFfS7+UtM1; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:35:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tafi.alm.flutnet.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C828978C23; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:35:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:35:52 +0200 From: Alson van der Meulen To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090729203552.GC2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <1248027417.14210.110.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <200907232335.54973.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A6FF5FA.5010904@FreeBSD.org> <200907282342.25038.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A707534.8000808@FreeBSD.org> <20090729170601.GA2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A709981.80600@FreeBSD.org> <20090729200013.GB2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A70ACD2.6030804@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A70ACD2.6030804@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:35:59 -0000 * Doug Barton [2009-07-29 22:10]: > I'm planning to remove the -u option altogether. It actually does very > little now, and certainly does not do what most users expect it should > do. Fine by me. I've never actually used -u, with -d (or the equivalent portmaster.rc setting) it's usually fine for unattended runs. The only annoyance is the question about building interactive ports that don't actually require any interaction (bacula comes to mind), since this is the only question in the config phase that's not cached, but this is probably the port maintainers fault for marking it interactive (it does remind me of "no keyboard present, press F1 to continue"). Alson