From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 21:10:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4ED89B; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A172120CA; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r85L9r4P058538; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:09:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r85L9rLa058537; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:09:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:09:53 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: David Chisnall Subject: Re: clang+libc++ using missing powl Message-ID: <20130905210953.GA58413@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20130904223842.GB82066@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <80062343-53CD-4CEF-9C47-3BF614DADB64@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80062343-53CD-4CEF-9C47-3BF614DADB64@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , "freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.org" , "current@freebsd.org Current" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:10:00 -0000 On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:52:13AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 4 Sep 2013, at 23:38, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > As a result we have a lot of fallouts of ports complaining about: > > undefined reference to `powl' > > > > It seems like libc++ is relying on a function we don't have yet > > in libm, am I missing something? > > I've attached a diff that I'd like to commit to msun Why not disable libc++ from exposing these functions? -- Steve