From owner-cvs-all Thu Aug 27 10:16:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA12574 for cvs-all-outgoing; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 10:16:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA12554 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 10:16:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@backplane.com) Received: (dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.8.8/8.6.5) id KAA14986; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 10:15:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 10:15:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199808271715.KAA14986@apollo.backplane.com> To: Sean Eric Fagan Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ping ping.8 ping.c Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk : :In article <199808271624.JAA14693.kithrup.freebsd.cvs-all@apollo.backplane.com> you write: :> I really don't think login.conf is the place to put application-specific :> restrictions. : :No, you apparantly think that applications are the place to put site-specific :restrictions. No, I think *system* suid and sgid applications need to protect themselves from potential user abuse. Hey dude, are you trying to start a flame war? Sheesh. Why don't you add a couple more cracks to that comment, you might really get something broiling. I made no such implication... that's you talking shit, not me, and I would appreciate it if you didn't try to analyize my thinking processes with me sitting in the room when you could just ask instead. -Matt Matthew Dillon Engineering, HiWay Technologies, Inc. & BEST Internet Communications (Please include original email in any response)