From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 3 14:35:51 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA28799 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 14:35:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA28793 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 14:35:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA20225; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 15:31:33 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199604032231.PAA20225@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Why free/net/open? To: alk@Think.COM (Tony Kimball) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 15:31:32 -0700 (MST) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199604031921.NAA00546@compound> from "Tony Kimball" at Apr 3, 96 01:21:59 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I have been unable to locate any adequate description of the reasons > for the divergence of NetBSD and FreeBSD, and again now of OpenBSD > from NetBSD. Can someone suggest a FAQ which addresses this issue? Net and Free did not "diverge" -- to "diverge", you had to be a single group to begin with. What they did was "not merge". 8-). OpenBSD is described, as distinct from NetBSD, at www.openbsd.org, and explains itself in that context. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.