From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 03:41:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C650116A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:41:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from S1.cableone.net (smtp1.cableone.net [24.116.0.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790BC43D53 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:41:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.local.lan (unverified [24.119.122.41]) by S1.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S1) with ESMTP id 22453659 for multiple; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 20:41:58 -0700 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:42:30 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Mike Tancsa Message-ID: <20050608224230.6acbda39@vixen42.local.lan> In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050608134054.06b8ccb0@64.7.153.2> References: <20050608001306.3FB1F43D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42A6C7CE.9000002@incubus.de> <200506080908.02478.fcash@ocis.net> <42A71AE1.8020300@incubus.de> <6.2.1.2.0.20050608134054.06b8ccb0@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.11 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 21, in=23, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.122.41 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Matthias Buelow Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 03:41:39 -0000 On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:42:45 -0400 Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 12:20 PM 08/06/2005, Matthias Buelow wrote: > > >I remember 5.2.1 panicking left and right, on several machines, it > >was completely unusable. Maybe we just live in different > >universes. > > Me too, but a lot has changed since 5.2.1 which at the time was I > think was called a preview. The topic is 5.4R. What parts of the > OS do you feel are not production ready as compared to 4.X ? It is safe saying a lot has changed since releng_5_3. The most imporant, imo, were those that happened shortly after releng_5_3 was released. Those fixed a few annoying problems I had with it. I feel perfectly safe running 5.4 in a production enviroment. Never had any problems with it.