From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 12 21:11:23 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5428CF3
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:11:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from xenophon+freebsd@irtnog.org)
Received: from mx1.irtnog.org (rrcs-24-123-13-61.central.biz.rr.com
 [24.123.13.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619B398F
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:11:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cinep001bsdgw.irtnog.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mx1.irtnog.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EBA1ADCC
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:11:21 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at irtnog.org
Received: from mx1.irtnog.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by cinep001bsdgw.irtnog.net (mx1.irtnog.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
 with ESMTP id MxWMD7csdPqu for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:11:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cinip100ntsbs.irtnog.net (cinip100ntsbs.irtnog.net
 [10.63.1.100]) by mx1.irtnog.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:11:19 -0500 (EST)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Expanding ZFS RAIDZ on the fly?
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:11:18 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Message-ID: <BABF8C57A778F04791343E5601659908236D4A@cinip100ntsbs.irtnog.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130111233428.GA54865@in-addr.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Expanding ZFS RAIDZ on the fly?
thread-index: Ac3wVEE7zwhwNePjSYK1XbPSVQQkXwAtIGpA
References: <50EFBAEA.3070200@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
 <CAFHbX1K4DLeg_cs01L2OEuy1ss=tfaA0XHAk2WBC2q5JjaagMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130111140557.GA63102@psconsult.nl>
 <BABF8C57A778F04791343E5601659908236D46@cinip100ntsbs.irtnog.net>
 <20130111233428.GA54865@in-addr.com>
From: "xenophon\\+freebsd" <xenophon+freebsd@irtnog.org>
To: <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:11:23 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> current@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gary Palmer
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 6:34 PM
>=20
> BPR doesn't look likely, unfortunately.

I wonder how other SANs implement restriping.  The HP P4000/P4500 can
restripe logical units, and it even maintains data redundancy in the
process.

--=20
I FIGHT FOR THE USERS