From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Apr 20 05:43:21 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14F8D47F5A for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 05:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1B1AF3 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 05:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id a103so56049530ioj.1 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:43:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tZv9MTiyzinme0UxSVCKfgajnQ9WdnXWiVhxOFBgg1U=; b=CNGGsFUSjS0aD6Q3VAm0OpiBqPH2c72wDS94VnI+x37c/l+vU58A9fZ90A5H83Fas+ pLVjHXq8+oQfVAocUcU8CvMS3/dsY0xHwifQtBL4wwNjEIaMY1IaqnoabFRZo5vqZtA0 I1yxjJwGwh6ioT6PvdRYyATOCN70GFCbJNXYpTDrZs5hWFbsOIdUVNyx8tXVf3V2Xo3k hD1kH7/m60BtdjthhEAyrZ0iFOeaybKZLO1c6sUMarm0Ju1nk5h+5PJyoMrYa3aYJDf+ kDL62tHrFK3TD0uD1CHlbGcTED183/4BpGFNuKKMb/ytzEF5YonA1JltZuUlZnooJ2cI IL6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=tZv9MTiyzinme0UxSVCKfgajnQ9WdnXWiVhxOFBgg1U=; b=jXV6VbjYZSpv5JODLZ4yDOQJtb0FpP/m4mlNDi7usSxrlbRn9Y72+YEsQzmNblCRm6 21FG569PSS9K1J0yD4aPs1wsryBwGiXh/CYVHMk2JS1DJ5rrkODyyHF9+10lmzaLI5qC V4Huozzlxz02K3TGVfhvcBGZ3M/OAtrZPxymUteuxjW7+qd/HnM0f/shU+VaCccusLwi XH+0aLW+LC7FU7EruoC33UlToqbekxOaZD4usoYOTj7RYRT8ug96eaLLYfUM554I93eB 6M0Cz6qLqzLejboiz+7ize627BIMOyq4dXaCb78IrU+jilsq4mzVNdib4+XL52pNnjWe ofZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6Z/HFh0ealXz+kfQynooDuRZkZ9QBUyl+swleXFV+5sPYCL8k0 Azf5bx1IO8JVmAMiKoEAXS9D5k/EtQ== X-Received: by 10.107.197.129 with SMTP id v123mr8281447iof.175.1492667000893; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:43:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.152.83 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:43:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <68ad0daa-b1f5-f3a6-f056-dcf2f0047d94@freebsd.org> References: <58F61A8D.1030309@a1poweruser.com> <68ad0daa-b1f5-f3a6-f056-dcf2f0047d94@freebsd.org> From: Torfinn Ingolfsen Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:43:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is pkg quarterly really needed? To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 05:43:22 -0000 On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > quarterly however is broken because the pkg mirors discard it all at the > time of update. > Do they have to? Why couldn't pkg mirrors keep say, the four latest quarterly sets all the time? This would increase the usability of quarterly packages, at users own risk, with only more diskspace as the expense for the FreeBSD projects / pkg mirrors. No extra work involved once the setup is configured and tested.