From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 27 04:19:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC6F255; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 04:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [64.62.153.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A0BE128E; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 04:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zeta.ixsystems.com (unknown [69.198.165.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E606E13036; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:19:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1393474780; bh=cz7qMQqvXNPDSSVtL4dQxitGOg/QkWOGkfaGM8n30HU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ALLJqcDJjFAFIVj5UvlLkKGKiXOWjeYs1SuZfPIWzParu/z9LPQ8kJO3s9dVXdnPJ pkrGI+B8CoOms4yySUFJnzhIG2Ih2cyPcFGKRSgo1IzpBntDTk439W4OrvgJ3vwK3N 4KGY46QC50A+pSC+xc5AADxN6bOd1+blu2mj62sc= Message-ID: <530EBCDB.1090303@delphij.net> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:19:39 -0800 From: Xin Li Organization: The FreeBSD Project MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Nosay , Brooks Davis Subject: Re: UDP Lite support References: <20140227021917.GE81440@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 04:19:47 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis > wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote: >>> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been >>> reconsidered or is the likelihood of too many damaged packets >>> the reason for not supporting? I'm not sure where to put this >>> question. Apologies for the noise. >> >> You've provided next to no context. What is the question? What >> thread are you referring to? If this is the usual UDP then >> freebsd-net would be vastly more appropriate than -current. >> >> -- Brooks >> > Thanks. I will ask kevlo and maybe bring it up on freebsd-net. It > has to do with an implementation of the JACK server using UDP Lite > for transferring data. > > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/UDP-lite-for-FreeBSD-td4010236.html Looks > like nobody proposed a patch? I think the concern was that this is not very useful in real-world scenarios due to link layer error detection mechanism but that doesn't raise a red flag to me assuming this is sufficiently self contained feature as it would improve compatibility with other operating systems. Cheers, - -- Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTDrzbAAoJEJW2GBstM+nsJVoP/29XRcleHMnAVa1UOG0+CD2y 0e/pAmk5vay599gjmiKSAuTSeKNaawRF3FZP+QsxhKw/lNTYEHlppUw7FDc01NqO pk1GsIu+mVuLlzZBNSuAkXdMMzJz5OKfY9GeK7Uw4iumiNP5LKpoC1RaYqLVASGf JH6tqJdSVnD+apWxV/PF4orCXZECFLkQZhbgZe+2nni+te6OfzIbkjhBqn8ZIDNY m9GbYwkTEATBDcMGgl9F0wBfcLhQLF4p4+TnsCguP0HAbxCtbZmt3SXe6Xt4y2YE iHlO/qstGKrl61aiehtpasjiljJaN5ucmuv8XDGbix4cghiJCJAGmxXGxCoHs/Uq vkn88wfV901pjYWPWf9HmTdjSmsck0k2+srWYlJuRymVKvMsL2mwPky+QL9SZ6MY NJ8kXUl5szFwdN4OtO+1iUvVZNLkVDlV5bmnc5KOkciFRoLuTq1/f/xzGj/YDZpx 2DxjddVyvJ6YhrUSSAGoOcdxIpDejKfVif0ANoocsKLAnTHtNxdB76doJH4wBl+W LAl9a9IqVOiefFe9qb6tZky3lft3HUe4XvLJPraKTfbvA9VAKPqZbc2Z8eeoqb49 LPC2n8WnlnaXB9KXKSWTLXbdcY2L+HnAt2+DEv4viSyKSXQg00aEbm+R95h1pTz7 oMv/8VGg5akyRQtkTTIx =ukUF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----