Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:19:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Jacques Vidrine <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include pwd.h src/lib/libc/gen getpwent.c src/usr.sbin/pwd_mkdb pwd_mkdb.c Message-ID: <20030420141848.K631@znfgre.tberna.bet> In-Reply-To: <200304181411.h3IEBH07088819@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200304181411.h3IEBH07088819@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've already told Jacques that I'd look into the problem with named, but more generally, I doubt this will be our only problem child. Has this new code been regression tested against any other third party code? Doug On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Jacques Vidrine wrote: > nectar 2003/04/18 07:11:17 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > include pwd.h > lib/libc/gen getpwent.c > usr.sbin/pwd_mkdb pwd_mkdb.c > Log: > Revert the definitions of _PW_KEY* to their previous values. There is > at least one consumer outside of libc and pwd_mkdb. > Adjust the versioning in libc and pwd_mkdb accordingly. > > named was the application affected, and that fact was first > Reported by: Zherdev Anatoly <tolyar@mx.ru> > > Sponsored by: DARPA, Network Associates Laboratories > > Revision Changes Path > 1.15 +27 -8 src/include/pwd.h > 1.72 +2 -2 src/lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c > 1.41 +25 -19 src/usr.sbin/pwd_mkdb/pwd_mkdb.c > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/include/pwd.h.diff?&r1=1.14&r2=1.15&f=h > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c.diff?&r1=1.71&r2=1.72&f=h > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/pwd_mkdb/pwd_mkdb.c.diff?&r1=1.40&r2=1.41&f=h > > -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030420141848.K631>