Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:42:27 -0800
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
To:        d@delphij.net
Cc:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Annoying ERROR: 'wlan0' is not a DHCP-enabled interface
Message-ID:  <CAGH67wRGqkJByQyOWTYwzCE5rHtSQVYMQq=AA_r9QX5GM0A4PA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EC6C247.6040807@delphij.net>
References:  <4EB6693F.2020102@delphij.net> <4EB71580.20507@FreeBSD.org> <4EB72290.8030104@delphij.net> <Snqh5lmyPm2YvkGpN1vSomauXwU@g5jH1yj%2BTnAiSdLOy3xs5Jutvhc> <4EC6C247.6040807@delphij.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 11/18/11 03:40, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
>> Gentlemen, good day.
>>
>> Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:13:04PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
>>> On 11/06/11 15:17, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> What harm is the error message causing? It seems useful to me
>>>> to know if something is happening in the background that may
>>>> need the administrator's attention.
>>>
>>> It's harmful because it's not an error -- for example, a bge0
>>> interface which is a member of lagg group, is usually marked
>>> explicitly as non-DHCP. =A0On the other hand, can you give me an
>>> example where it *is* an error? :-) =A0I can't seem to think about
>>> one but I could be wrong here.
>>>
>>> It sounds like to me a POLA violation by the way since it's not
>>> the way it was, but my argument is primarily about "this gives an
>>> error message for valid configuration" and not about POLA.
>>
>> Since devd.conf uses quietstart, there is a way to make everyone
>> happy or at least not so angry: check rc_quiet and act accordingly.
>> The patch is available at
>> http://codelabs.ru/fbsd/patches/dhclient/dhclient-respect-quiet-mode.dif=
f
>>
>>
> please, test it and report back.
>
> Is there any counter reasoning about "having an interface marked as
> non-DHCP is not an error"? =A0I'm still not convinced with the benefit
> of having it show an error message.

+1. I consider this to be debug noise.
Thanks,
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wRGqkJByQyOWTYwzCE5rHtSQVYMQq=AA_r9QX5GM0A4PA>