From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 00:21:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF46F106566C for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC6C8FC12 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb13 with SMTP id 13so155857wwb.31 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:21:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MpFrWu5vCvLrt/ElPANYeVViP6CitMJH8OWns9Ls/QM=; b=Mvi/OHG4zTyP3Jy0qAYiBMKYC436CyWMGzQNgwVS/qU94MzNXqUGulIH6uuioPi7VU 9jqPUfIalwKVYNPSfPif3PVIZDuw95M+w4MKXeaU+A9CzGG0dX9T0uuisL4ZYxHlb4mi qgnHMtVHdlk4H0MCSplH5/XdChXTdbtviWpn8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EyeTUzIoZdZDFNqnptfyW6KUvZvq9OvMHdXR9m+WeUlTmE0M/BFoGEKreRWnBmrZl8 /Q1uYEDCOw1IYjonG8oox0pVjEzBPXpO+93c4xBu51lxwkSd+myQntz/06WzLEgL57rl vnZVT7mh1JPptc9AobOpGXbet64gmUBPR2LAs= Received: by 10.227.145.135 with SMTP id d7mr6048997wbv.96.1289262107241; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:21:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a17sm473857wbe.0.2010.11.08.16.21.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:21:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:21:43 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101109002143.76a55db2@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <4CD6FC57.5020205@blakemfg.com> <20101107203111.37d72c45.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101107145711.1da79e9a@scorpio> <20101108062255.432ca434@scorpio> <20101108143759.271acd17@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portmaster question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:21:49 -0000 On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:50:21 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, RW wrote: > > > -aRr isn't implied by -a, the rR options are ignored in the former. > > > > I think it's fairly clear that recursing through installed > > packages with consistent dependecies isn't going to find a package > > that isn't in the set of all installed packages. > > That sentence makes me a little dizzy. I think you mean that since > -a is equivalent to listing all packages on the command line, -r or > -R are redundant. > > So portupgrade \* (i.e., -a) is a superset of > > portupgrade -r libexample > > because all the dependencies of libexample are included in the \* and > so portupgrade will see they need to be updated because a port they > depend on has been updated... Right? yes