From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Aug 1 21:10:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B406DBD6F2 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 21:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from asp.reflexion.net (outbound-mail-210-89.reflexion.net [208.70.210.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0978B695E7 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 21:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: (qmail 32254 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2017 21:03:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rtc-sm-01.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.150.1) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 1 Aug 2017 21:03:25 -0000 Received: by rtc-sm-01.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v8.40.1) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:03:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 10884 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2017 21:03:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iron2.pdx.net) (69.64.224.71) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 1 Aug 2017 21:03:25 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.109] (c-67-170-167-181.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.170.167.181]) by iron2.pdx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64A7FEC94BE for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Pine64+ 2GB and RPI3 (A64 examples): Any general idea on what/when to expect for the return of USB support to head? Message-Id: Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:03:23 -0700 To: freebsd-arm X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 21:10:07 -0000 [I historically use a ufs USB SSD for a (head) root file system on a Pine64+ 2GB and a RPI3. Thus the question below.] Context for question (note the "USB not working for now" in the Log Message): > Revision 320612 >=20 > Author: > manu > Date: > Mon Jul 3 19:30:03 2017 UTC (4 weeks, 1 day ago) > Changed paths: > 5 > Log Message: > allwinner: Add A64 ccung support >=20 > Upstream DTS for A64 SoC doesn't provide a /clocks node as Linux = switched > to ccu-ng > This commit adds the necessary bits to boot on pine64 with latest DTS = from > upstream. > USB is not working for now and some node aren't present in the DTS = (like the > PMU, Power Management Unit). >=20 > Tested on: Pine64 >=20 > Changed paths > Path > Details > head/sys/arm/allwinner/a10_mmc.c > modified , text changed > head/sys/arm/allwinner/clkng/aw_ccung.c > modified , text changed > head/sys/arm/allwinner/clkng/ccu_a64.c > added > head/sys/arm/allwinner/clkng/ccu_a64.h > added > head/sys/conf/files.arm64 > modified , text changed /head/sys/arm/allwinner/clkng/ccu_a64.c shows an empty "USBPHY clk sel" section: 553 /* USBPHY clk sel */ 554=09 555 /* DRAM needs update bit */ tending to confirm the log message. The questions: Does anyone have a general idea that they can report for what/when to expect for the return of USB support for Pine64+ 2GB, RPI3, and the like A64 based contexts? Should I just ignore updating the Pine64+ 2GB and RPI3 for a few months more? (Because I do self-hosted builds on them I want the USB file system to be used for such activity.) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net