Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:33:16 -0500 From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster Message-ID: <af68c59e-407d-b480-f752-28f00c308771@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <8cdf045f-a333-0fcf-c1ab-2fea2114e384@abinet.ru> References: <CAB88xy_RU5TTE=pcsjCWsxWyU-jP91qzD9S-R1v6GKGHJg2=nQ@mail.gmail.com> <945f6d92-6834-7e2c-18c4-0a17e2c04122@columbus.rr.com> <44shneot7h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900@columbus.rr.com> <1244d826-e4ae-97a9-6033-8a1c79c2da9e@m5p.com> <7d0525ee-980e-a63a-f90f-974a7e1022cf@columbus.rr.com> <9ffa861978cdb1a06a69d7b9af525ad5@ultimatedns.net> <8cdf045f-a333-0fcf-c1ab-2fea2114e384@abinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --QxTsauF5lU6CIaTo1JARPhDfgiuRTSNku Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8xJ2SIR91FEqt8hhXvqUpx3Dbdi3icvr6"; protected-headers="v1" From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <af68c59e-407d-b480-f752-28f00c308771@m5p.com> Subject: Re: The future of portmaster References: <CAB88xy_RU5TTE=pcsjCWsxWyU-jP91qzD9S-R1v6GKGHJg2=nQ@mail.gmail.com> <945f6d92-6834-7e2c-18c4-0a17e2c04122@columbus.rr.com> <44shneot7h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900@columbus.rr.com> <1244d826-e4ae-97a9-6033-8a1c79c2da9e@m5p.com> <7d0525ee-980e-a63a-f90f-974a7e1022cf@columbus.rr.com> <9ffa861978cdb1a06a69d7b9af525ad5@ultimatedns.net> <8cdf045f-a333-0fcf-c1ab-2fea2114e384@abinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <8cdf045f-a333-0fcf-c1ab-2fea2114e384@abinet.ru> --8xJ2SIR91FEqt8hhXvqUpx3Dbdi3icvr6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/17/17 02:37, abi wrote: > 17.02.2017 00:22, Chris H =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:48:57 -0500 Baho Utot >> <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> wrote >> >>> [...] >> Hello. You shouldn't have any difficulty accomplishing your goal >> by simply setting up a jail, and using portmaster within that jail(8).= >> portmaster really doesn't care where it's run. So long as it has >> everything it needs to accomplish it's job(s). :-) >> > From my point of view, jails are overkill. Chroot should be enough and > it would be nice if portmaster starts building in clean environment. >=20 Some of us might even consider chroot overkill. I'm fine with a chroot option, but let's not turn portmaster into something that unconditionally requires more resources than the underlying build needs. -- George --8xJ2SIR91FEqt8hhXvqUpx3Dbdi3icvr6-- --QxTsauF5lU6CIaTo1JARPhDfgiuRTSNku Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZXwRES3m+p4fkFAlim+6IACgkQwRES3m+p 4fnTOA/7BCuykWEj3Z7vx2zY96LK10mNm9glX1ktqAMEd7hGSmjsViIjyvSODYrL lyj/2Zdh5mzimh1TwPXMygBhqWXSKVmugf0FWh/prWKiaLm2TJT+s2kxQtu4iXt2 H744JRKdhisTe6kjqvSn0DV7gnv34ZDoggD6CBWN5cvj5blTLhO8PKFdDhII6RIA RI/VHwHZN67F0CE59Wq6u5nx/RNuvrPr8wjWW3FmFlMOAug/NUOo1CfvJyjtCvAd z5CSJV+HFC7Kc8GvG/7keqTSLwwnYJf07oaHwRBTS0g7mOX+gdiGfkHk/vZsQWgE 4VtJmc3NfXuATCYtfDN+3g6vWX3SjaAtAxJCU3R3WKLwmB6fjCiFyHcBi7wsUjfN TMeznlGB92nGgKtbEWc4VeSqN1f3uXVmFKFUD2FdqA7pK0b/WE7dRYvMotGXgPQE VVt29+Oqm7IWz1j/cZTqzRXYG2/r7ZJLtse1wx85T16DydXFxEm2+8uOXjLvdS49 OnUeY0B6cZEfGVJCd3HTM8tEMntLLlHeGq1ZQ6rjuOT1gxdR/3/L/L8m6qQzpXL3 vqXTOvqCXVzkp7719P7tN2B+fATadyv9TXTJUUwTVSzN43WHLcVUN3azQdacamLb 9f9sdv7hkoh9mUF0e1HbklEQMmn30ootX1XGwE9+52TwkHCIHeY= =8xQA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QxTsauF5lU6CIaTo1JARPhDfgiuRTSNku--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?af68c59e-407d-b480-f752-28f00c308771>