From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 7 12:32:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29628106564A for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 12:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33618FC1A for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 12:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id o47CW1RM075244; Fri, 7 May 2010 05:32:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id o47CW1R1075243; Fri, 7 May 2010 05:32:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 05:32:01 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Ladan Message-ID: <20100507123201.GL49209@bunrab.catwhisker.org> References: <19428.941.605850.331539@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9axOBMfiLLqytT81" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Robert Huff Subject: Re: UPDATING entry for X.org changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 12:32:11 -0000 --9axOBMfiLLqytT81 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:20:55PM +0200, Ren=E9 Ladan wrote: > 2010/5/7 Robert Huff : > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Is there one? =A0I've been checking daily, and ... nothi= ng. > > (Various sited, including just now "cvsup.freebsd.org:.) > > > > > No, there is indeed none for now. Correct. > If you use portmaster you can just run 'portmaster -af' or follow the > instructions near the end of its manual page (before Doug Barton > goes correcting me ;) ) I'm not Doug, but I based on my experience with the transition (using portmaster), I'd say that would be overkill: you don't need to force-upgrade all installed ports merely because X.org was upgraded (except in the rather special case that all installed ports are part of or depend on parts of X.org). When I did the upgrade, there was a problem with one of the input drivers that the x11/xorg meta-port had brought in (but that I didn't actually use); that was fixed within a couple of days, so if I were to do the upgrade, I'd merely use portmaster --index -ad but you'll want to evaluate that compared to your normal practice and proceed accordingly. (In my case, that's what I normally use to upgrade ports, absent an applicable UPDATING entry directing other actions.) Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --9axOBMfiLLqytT81 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iEUEARECAAYFAkvkCEEACgkQmprOCmdXAD3FOACVFAJ6liUFfmlcg0NXmi3mzImJ qQCbBLAkaYDJdiEY9xJMktLlmlwh2T8= =TIhq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9axOBMfiLLqytT81--