From owner-cvs-lib  Mon Dec 30 12:12:44 1996
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-lib>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA15647
          for cvs-lib-outgoing; Mon, 30 Dec 1996 12:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id MAA15642;
          Mon, 30 Dec 1996 12:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA15659; Mon, 30 Dec 1996 12:12:30 -0800 (PST)
To: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM>
cc: joerg@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-lib@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/net res_stubs.c Makefile.inc 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 30 Dec 1996 20:42:38 +0800."
             <199612301242.UAA16567@spinner.DIALix.COM> 
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 12:12:29 -0800
Message-ID: <15655.851976749@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-lib@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Anyway, the idea was that these files should go into 2.2 after testing in 
> -current for a day or two...  Perhaps this slip of fingers forced the 
> issue.  Joerg?  Jordan?  You want these backed out? (I've been using them 
> in approximately this form for 8 weeks)  Or wait and see if it causes 
> problems first?

I'm willing to leave them in there until/unless they cause problems.
We've still got a few weeks of testing ahead, so better now than later. :)

					Jordan