From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 22 17:52:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E13816A643 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D7443D8F for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:18:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net) Received: from gw2.local.net (unknown [62.3.210.251]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E54236F8F for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:18:26 +0100 (BST) From: "Greg Hennessy" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'S=E9bastien_AVELINE'?= , Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:18:24 +0100 Keywords: freebsd-pf Message-ID: <000b01c6961f$de54f4a0$0a00a8c0@thebeast> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <449AC5F8.9000905@alinto.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcaWHXeElG0bJJAlRLG3mcBoGOh9wgAAZcIg X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2006 17:18:24.0490 (UTC) FILETIME=[DE54F4A0:01C6961F] Cc: Subject: RE: pf and policy routing X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:52:37 -0000 > > Thanks for your answer but what do you think of using ipfw > for routing policy and pf for firewalling, is it possible ? With two active packet filters in the system, I would not like to be the one trying to debug problems. One can do policy based routing in PF using route-to. Greg