From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 20:05:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB1316A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:05:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: from bsd.ultra-secure.de (bsd.ultra-secure.de [62.146.20.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1171E43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:05:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: (qmail 94061 invoked by uid 89); 9 Nov 2005 20:05:30 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 94040, pid: 94057, t: 1.2391s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.86.2/m:33/d:1045 spam: 3.0.4 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.100.179?) (rainer@ultra-secure.de@213.196.191.65) by bsd.ultra-secure.de with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 20:05:28 -0000 Message-ID: <43725683.8080805@ultra-secure.de> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:05:23 +0100 From: Rainer Duffner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <43723F49.9010109@ultra-secure.de> <43725294.2010905@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <43725294.2010905@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on bsd.ultra-secure.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=7.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 Subject: Re: 6.0 panics with 3GB and 4GB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:05:32 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > Rainer Duffner wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> this is on a dual 1.2 GHz Supermicro P3TDE6 board. >> >> Sorry, I can't provide more details, just wanted to let you know. >> I have little time, so I just removed the RAM. The machine is fine >> with 1 or 2 GB RAM. >> >> >> cheers, >> Rainer > > > Can't help you without more details. I regularly run with 4-8GB of RAM > without any problems whatsoever. It may only be this silly board. I've recently played with a 6.0 RC on a Dual Xeon 3.2 (Lindenhurst) and it worked. The machines are relatively old now - they are being re-purposed now, piece-by-piece. But RH7.2 seems to work with it. Rainer