Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:48:28 +0000
From:      William Grzybowski <wg@freebsd.org>
To:        Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r315222 - in head: devel/qdevelop games/warmux graphics/xaos math/qtiplot multimedia/minitube print/hplip textproc/qstardict
Message-ID:  <20130405124828.GA92713@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <33299091.KSdYOtgceu@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk>
References:  <201303251359.r2PDxIXf035701@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgkipVS-gneKbOO-zFyUm=W3AeffBDGd2EegcUt8iXufDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMHz58TjHwW9iKb2jSSBUrWk-zqt4%2B4PDfxxcqBZVxShg_YjTA@mail.gmail.com> <33299091.KSdYOtgceu@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:40:07PM +0000, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:24:32 +0800 Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
> > I think these options can be used globally and also per port. These options
> > are just on by default via bsd.options.mk. Users should be able to turn
> > them off through options dialog while building/installing specific port. I
> > think it has higher possibility that one user wants to install
> > documentation/examples of *some ports but not all ports*. As a result, we
> > should keep those options. At least we shall not always hide them.
> > 
> > If maintainers think these options are annoying, they could put them to the
> > end of OPTIONS_DEFINE.
> 
> We don't disagree about  DOCS/NSL/etc options, when a ports already defines
> other options. The question is should these options be in OPTIONS_DEFINE
> if they are the only options provided by the port (read: allow option dialog
> to pop up with trivial option set for virtually every port)?

Sorry to jump in this thread.

But what about change .mk to do not issue a make config if OPTIONS_DEFINE is only
consisted of global options? Someone could manually run make config if wanted to.

I agree it would be very annoying let it pop up for every trivial port.


> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 27 March 2013 22:53, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 01:59:18PM +0000, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> > > >> New Revision: 315222
> > > >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/315222
> > > >>
> > > >> - Remove OPTIONS_DEFINE, if it contains only global options
> > > >
> > > > Can you elaborate on this one?  Given that there is no clear policy,
> > > > personally I've been always including OPTIONS_DEFINE, even if just for,
> > > say,
> > > > DOCS.
> > >
> > > Options such as IPV6, DOCS, EXAMPLES, and NLS are generally set
> > > globally (e.g., OPTIONS_UNSET= NLS) and not per port.  As such, it can
> > > reduce user annoyance if the dialog box is not shown for such options.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eitan Adler
> > > Source, Ports, Doc committer
> > > Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
> > >



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130405124828.GA92713>