From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 9 21:23:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232E61065670; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:23:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E59E8FC18; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n59LMuNR008919; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:22:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n59LMunj008916; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:22:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:22:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: krad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20090609172142.GA92146@ebi.local> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:28:17 +0000 Cc: 'Nick Barkas' , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, 'Dan Naumov' , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: RE: sysinstall, GJOURNAL and ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:23:03 -0000 > Hmm I disagree about large fs have large files. We have inherited quite a > few mail servers at work with 1 TB + fs. They had 10 of millions of files. still 100kB/file. It's fine to use -b 32768 -f 4096 -i 65536 (or 32768 at least)