From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Aug 11 22: 7:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4BE37B400 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-156-170.client.attbi.com [12.233.156.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA01C43E42 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7C57Rqu002085; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7C57AGD002084; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:10 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Garrett Rooney Cc: Morten Rodal , kpieckiel@smartrafficenter.org, Bosko Milekic , Mario Pranjic , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP kernel: FreeBSD vs. Linux 2.4.x Message-ID: <20020812050710.GA1998@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Garrett Rooney , Morten Rodal , kpieckiel@smartrafficenter.org, Bosko Milekic , Mario Pranjic , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020809091008.A87124@unixdaemons.com> <20020809164411.GC78503@pacer.dmz.smartrafficenter.org> <20020809171743.GB290@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20020809203355.GE6050@slurp.rodal.no> <20020809203934.GA94313@electricjellyfish.net> <20020811035646.GB589@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020811035646.GB589@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake David Schultz : > That's what I heard, although I still don't know how the > approaches are different. I read the Anderson paper, but I can't > seem to find any documentation about the FreeBSD approach. (Given > the signal delivery problems we're currently having, I'd guess > that Julian et al. are going through the same hell that the > Solaris developers did when implementing threading.) Could you > please ellaborate on the differences in the FreeBSD approach? To answer on my own question based on information Julian posted to -current today: http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/freebsd_kse.tgz To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message