From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sun Aug 25 22:14:43 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BDAC7091; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 22:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46GqDy696Tz4YV3; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 22:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-67-180-169-236.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.169.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id x7PMEeA5027112 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Aug 2019 15:14:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-67-180-169-236.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.169.236] claimed to be yv.noip.me Reply-To: yuri@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r509806 - head/math/blasfeo To: Adam Weinberger Cc: ports-committers , svn-ports-all , svn-ports-head References: <201908251703.x7PH3bbw038772@repo.freebsd.org> <989bea15-de1b-a2af-1221-72da9dbe4f06@freebsd.org> From: Yuri Message-ID: Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 15:14:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46GqDy696Tz4YV3 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.91 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.914,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7961, ipnet:198.144.192.0/20, country:US] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 22:14:43 -0000 On 2019-08-25 15:02, Adam Weinberger wrote: > It looks to me like OPTIONS_DEFAULT is being set dynamically by > multiple substitutions. If OPTIONS_DEFAULT=GENERIC, then why are you > reconstructing it manually? > > If there's a constant default, and the other options are selectable, > what is all the dynamic target doing? Options are defined based on architecture. Currently only the amd64 architecture defines options. The end result is that TARGET=GENERIC by default, whether through options or through the default. Yuri