From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 10 01:56:34 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA04388 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 10 May 1996 01:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from melb.werple.net.au (melb.werple.net.au [203.9.190.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA04381 for ; Fri, 10 May 1996 01:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cimaxp1.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with UUCP id SAA11846 for mira!FreeBSD.ORG!hackers; Fri, 10 May 1996 18:11:12 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <199605100811.SAA11846@melb.werple.net.au> Received: by cimaxp1.cimlogic.com.au; (5.65/1.1.8.2/10Sep95-0953AM) id AA17239; Fri, 10 May 1996 18:12:14 +1000 From: John Birrell Subject: Re: libc_r threads doco? To: devetir.qld.gov.au!sysseh@melb.werple.net.au (Stephen Hocking) Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 18:12:13 +1000 (EST) Cc: FreeBSD.ORG!hackers@melb.werple.net.au In-Reply-To: <199605100559.FAA24174@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au> from "Stephen Hocking" at May 10, 96 03:59:01 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Anyone got any idea where to find a paper on the variety of threads used in > libc_r? Are they pthread compliant?\ At the moment they're closer to draft 4 of POSIX 1003.1c than draft 10 (the latest). I've got a local version that is closer, but not quite there yet... I've had no time to work on this lately. > > > Stephen > -- > The views expressed above are not those of the Worker's Compensation Board of > Queensland, Australia. > > > -- John Birrell CIMlogic Pty Ltd jb@cimlogic.com.au 119 Cecil Street Ph +61 3 9690 6900 South Melbourne Vic 3205 Fax +61 3 9690 6650 Australia Mob +61 18 353 137