Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 01:38:05 -0600 (CST) From: Ryan Thompson <ryan@sasknow.com> To: William Wong <willwong@anime.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: good alternatives to imap-uw Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004180132590.94740-100000@ren.sasknow.com> In-Reply-To: <005b01bfa905$ee050420$0300a8c0@anime.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
William Wong wrote to freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG: > Hi, > > After reading the recent security vulnerbility in imap-uw, I'm looking for > alternative imap/pop daemons. Looking through Ports I came up with a list of > progs that support imap/pop. If anyone could recommend a particular > program/package I'd like to hear from you. I recall a number of people > recommending the cyrus package. FWIW, I've been using cyrus in production for months now and have had nothing but success. (Mind you, the initial configuration is certainly more involved than that of "simpler" daemons). Cyrus supports individual user quotas, arbitrary mailbox creation, ACLs (great for shared mailboxes and the like) and a whole slew of other things I haven't found anywhere else. It's stable, fast, secure, and is well supported. > imap&pop > ----------- > cyrus -- Ryan Thompson <ryan@sasknow.com> Systems Administrator, Accounts Phone: +1 (306) 664-1161 SaskNow Technologies http://www.sasknow.com #106-380 3120 8th St E Saskatoon, SK S7H 0W2 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004180132590.94740-100000>