Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:43:23 +0000
From:      Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why do we have both ghostscript-gpl and ghostscript-gnu?
Message-ID:  <20041230104323.GA44922@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <41D3BA59.9060505@redesjm.local>
References:  <20041229222343.GA71433@dragon.nuxi.com> <41D3BA59.9060505@redesjm.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 09:20:41AM +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> >What's the difference between ghostscript-gpl and ghostscript-gnu?  A
> >diff of their Makefile's doesn't make it any clearer.
> >
> > 
> >
> Versions.
> It was after a change in licence from the originator.

According to the pkg-descr, these should both be the same (the GNU GPL).

> 
> -gnu must remain at 7.x and unmaintained.
> -gpl is the new 8.x source distribution.

Please add this information to pkg-descr.

In general, whenever somebody copy a port - MAKE SURE BOTH pkg-descr FILES
DESCRIBE THE DIFFERENCES.  (This is a general plea - we've got maybe a hundred
duplicates, and they're annoying.)

Eivind.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041230104323.GA44922>