Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:45:34 +0900 From: SHIOZAKI Takehiko <st@be.to> To: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Cc: dinoex@FreeBSD.org, vivek@khera.org, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>, anton@chelcom.ru, g.gonter@ieee.org, FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, mnag@FreeBSD.org, udo.schweigert@siemens.com, krion@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: removing the old cyrus-sasl port Message-ID: <20070406064534.GA84847@localhost.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <460EA3CD.7080007@FreeBSD.org> References: <460D434D.7000605@FreeBSD.org> <20070330183853.GB1573@roadrunner.q.local> <460EA3CD.7080007@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[On Mar 31, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> wrote:] >Yes, it's definitely a good idea. I think we can repo-copy cyrus-sasl2 >to cyrus-sasl as Grog mentioned, and handle the knobs after maintainers >removed the references to the old cyrus-sasl for their ports. I'm not >sure, if the new version is completely compatible with the old one, and >there are ports that support both ones, so we should make sure first if >all ports work with cyrus-sasl2, that's why I sent this headsup. Unfortunately, SASL1 and SASL2 seem incompatible. For example, the numbers of parameters of sasl_client_start and sasl_decode64 are changed in SASL2 as described in /usr/local/share/doc/cyrus-sasl2/html/appconvert.html. -- SHIOZAKI Takehiko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070406064534.GA84847>