From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jun 15 18:26:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA07009 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 18:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu (we-refuse-to-spy-on-our-users@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA07002 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 18:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12GNU) id VAA15617; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 21:26:15 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 21:26:15 -0400 Message-Id: <199706160126.VAA15617@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu> From: "Joel N. Weber II" To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au CC: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu, chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199706160105.KAA08436@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> (message from Michael Smith on Mon, 16 Jun 1997 10:35:12 +0930 (CST)) Subject: Re: To UNIX or not to UNIX ;-). Was: PPP problems. x-url: http://www.red-bean.com/~nemo x-attribution: nemo x-foobar: Any philosophy that can be put in a nutshell belongs there. --Harris Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk From: Michael Smith Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 10:35:12 +0930 (CST) Joel N. Weber II stands accused of saying: > we want to use. (I may well rewrite parts of the user interface > in Guile and use Tk; I don't know yet.) Tk already comes with a perfectly good scripting language; Tcl. Don't let another of RMS' irrational bigotisms put you off. It's perfectly rational. At least, I know I like C, and I know I don't like perl. But I'm inclined to agree with RMS's critcisms of TCL. There's some Linux distribution that I don't use (yet) on my own machines that requires perl for basic functionality. I hate that. [this is someone else rambling] Actually, both parts were written by someone @gnu.ai.mit.edu whose name is Joel.