From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Aug 26 17: 4: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBDA37B400 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 17:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7AB43E6A for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 17:04:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id EA893AE163; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 17:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 17:04:04 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Julian Elischer Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Process/thread states. Message-ID: <20020827000404.GM96154@elvis.mu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Julian Elischer [020826 17:00] wrote: > > Ok so I've mentionned this to a few peopel at different times and not got > any real feedback/pushback.. time fopr a wider audience. ... > e.g. something like: (yeah I know its messy but...): > > > > #define TD_ST_SUSPQ 0x01 /* uses runq field */ > #define TD_ST_RUNQ 0x02 /* uses runq field */ > #define TD_ST_RUNNING 0x03 /* uses no (virtual) field */ > #define TD_ST_MTX 0x04 /* uses mtx field */ > #define TD_ST_RQ_MASK 0x07 /* mask of non sleep states */ > #define TD_ST_SLPQ 0x08 /* uses slpq field */ > enum thread_state { > TDS_UNQUEUED = 0x00, > TDS_SLP = TD_ST_SLPQ, > TDS_RUNQ = TD_ST_RUNQ, > TDS_RUNNING = TD_ST_RUNNING, > TDS_SUSPENDED = TD_ST_SUSPQ, > TDS_MTX = TD_ST_MTX, > TDS_SUSP_SLP = TD_ST_SUSPQ|TD_ST_SLPQ, > TDS_RUN_SLP = TD_ST_RUNNING|TD_ST_SLPQ, > TDS_RUNQ_SLP = TD_ST_RUNQ|TD_ST_SLPQ, > TDS_MTX_SLP = TD_ST_MTX|TD_ST_SLPQ, > TDS_SWAPPING = TD_ST_SLPQ|TD_ST_RQ_MASK + 1, > TDS_IWAIT, /* needed? */ > TDS_SURPLUS /* needed? */ > }; This seems good, another option would be to mostly expose things through a functional interface, like proc_set_swapping() or something. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message