Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:49:55 +0200 From: Wolfgang Riegler <wolfgang@riegler.homeip.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gateway_enable Message-ID: <201009171049.55372.wolfgang@riegler.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <4C911EC0.9000607@beatsnet.com> References: <201009152110.36850.wolfgang.riegler@gmx.de> <4C911EC0.9000607@beatsnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you for your support. You're right, our administrator has to add a route back to the new gateway. Am Mittwoch, 15. September 2010, 21:30:08 schrieb Beat Siegenthaler: > > On 15.09.10 21:10, Wolfgang Riegler wrote: > > > > I thought gateway_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf should be sufficient. But it doesn't work. Do I need something else? > > > > > > > Looks all ok. > But does 192.168.40.1 have a route to 192.168.50.0/24 via GW > 192.168.40.122? > > > > Internet: > > > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > > > default 192.168.40.1 UGS 0 0 rl0 > > > 127.0.0.1 link#6 UH 0 0 lo0 > > > 192.168.40.0/24 link#2 U 1 274 rl0 > > > 192.168.40.122 link#2 UHS 0 0 lo0 > > > 192.168.50.0/24 link#1 U 0 15 re0 > > > 192.168.50.1 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 > > > > Gruss Beat > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201009171049.55372.wolfgang>