From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun 29 19:00:25 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA15065
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 19:00:25 -0700
Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.191.196.34])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA15057
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 19:00:14 -0700
Received: (from tom@localhost) by misery.sdf.com (8.7.Beta.7/8.7.Beta.7) id TAA15193; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 19:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 19:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, nc@ai.net, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Load Balancing/Sharing w/ FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <199506300021.JAA23951@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950629190109.15174B-100000@misery.sdf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


On Fri, 30 Jun 1995, Michael Smith wrote:

> >   Not all terminal servers support DLS.  It is also pretty useless if 
> > access is not through a modem server.
> 
...

> -  Not using a modem server in the original scenario is Just Plain Stupid;
>   if you have a set of servers that are likely to be so loaded
>   that you don't want logins to them, putting modems on them is a 
>   Really Bad Idea.

  I was refering to telnet/rlogin access from other hosts.  I would 
hardly call that "Stupid".

Tom