From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 27 18:25:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F53616A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:25:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com (mailout04.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394F043D45 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:25:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from M.Santhoff@t-online.de) Received: from fwd24.aul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1DQrEE-0003e6-02; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:25:42 +0200 Received: from localhost.das.netz (r1mYdwZlwekpN-dWzBdeaubVAb8U05bCgEveG-ZvOlW1i7ShpGxyEg@[217.251.166.175]) by fwd24.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1DQrDx-0HbgA40; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:25:25 +0200 Received: from [10.0.0.3] (zaphod.das.netz [10.0.0.3]) by localhost.das.netz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3RIO8VH073730 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:24:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from M.Santhoff@t-online.de) From: Marc Santhoff To: "FreeBSD stable (Liste)" In-Reply-To: <20050427181013.GB6256@stack.nl> References: <1114623987.302.82.camel@zaphod.das.netz> <20050427181013.GB6256@stack.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1114626276.302.89.camel@zaphod.das.netz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:24:36 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: r1mYdwZlwekpN-dWzBdeaubVAb8U05bCgEveG-ZvOlW1i7ShpGxyEg X-TOI-MSGID: 7145312c-91c4-40c3-9d59-62b065e4504c Subject: Re: [4.11] sysctl reports garbage X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:25:43 -0000 Am Mi, den 27.04.2005 schrieb Marc Olzheim um 20:10: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 07:46:28PM +0200, Marc Santhoff wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've updates my system this morning after reading about the usb mfc. The > > sources used before are dated from january. I'm not sure if this error > > was triggered by the update, but: > > > > Using "sysctl -a" it seems to lose track after some lines. > > > > > kern.msgbuf: failed, STALLED > > umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, STALLED > > > > That is 'kern.msgbuf' ;-) Hm, I've never seen such a verbose output before. Has anything changed in that area? And why does it still occur after a reboot, normally buffers are only temporarily valid(at least I thought so until a few minutes)? Sorry for the noise, Marc