From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 21:59:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364B416A4CE; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:59:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.sanda.gr.jp (ns1.sanda.gr.jp [219.117.208.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF24C43D58; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:59:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from non@ever.sanda.gr.jp) Received: from oliv.ever.sanda.gr.jp (oliv [10.93.63.4]) by ns1.sanda.gr.jp (8.11.6/3.7W) with ESMTP id i2C5xfr02194; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:59:41 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost.ever.sanda.gr.jp [127.0.0.1]) by oliv.ever.sanda.gr.jp (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i2C5xZZo015602; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:59:36 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from non@ever.sanda.gr.jp) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:59:35 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040312.145935.18322000.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp> To: imp@bsdimp.com From: non@ever.sanda.gr.jp In-Reply-To: <20040306.073514.38701247.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <4048730A.10109@cronyx.ru> <20040306.214705.109508001.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp> <20040306.073514.38701247.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: rik@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: non@ever.sanda.gr.jp cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: rik@cronyx.ru cc: matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 ct.4 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 05:59:43 -0000 From: "M. Warner Losh" Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 07:35:14 -0700 (MST) > : > >Maybe just a simple note in non-san's ct.4 man page would solve this > : > >for now, and a greater attention to avoid clashes in the future. > : > > > : > Why not to create man4.pc98? > : > : I am not sure here, but my guess is, we have several man pages which > : are shared between i386/i386 and i386/pc98. So if we just create > : man4.pc98 just like other architectures, we will have to copy and > : maintain those pages. > > We can easily 'reach over' in the Makefile for man4.pc98 for the list > of things that's shared. OK, I now understand how to do it. I am not against creating man4.pc98 and I am preparing for it. However, I prefer the name `ctau.4' since we are using the name in, - sys/dev/`ctau' - sys/dev/`ctau'.c - device line in sys/i386/conf/NOTES and so on. People who don't know about ctau will want to see ctau.4 not ct.4. People who do know adding the `device ctau' line in the conf file don't need the manual page or want to see ctau.4. People who know `ct' in Linux can easily search NOTES or do `man -k' by `ct' or the name of the hardware. I also think we should change the name in sys/conf/majors too. Second reason is that we should not use the same name for the different drivers in FreeBSD. It is confusing and may cause confliction as nyan-san suggests. Although, Warner-san wrote both are `nitch' device, the SCSI cards which ct driver supoort are not `nitch' device. They are major devices for pc98. Since first one (original one from NEC) was introduced in the early days of PC-9801 series and they are used as the only SCSI supporting host adapters for years. // Noriaki Mitsunaga //