Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:53:59 +0400 From: Boris Polevoy <vapcom@mail.ru> To: Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@benzedrine.cx> Cc: mlaier@freebsd.org, pf@benzedrine.cx, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: anchors - weirdness Message-ID: <E1FvqPX-000NjB-00.vapcom-mail-ru@f7.mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060629052504.GA12614@insomnia.benzedrine.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@benzedrine.cx> To: David Diggles <david@elven.com.au> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 07:25:04 +0200 Subject: Re: anchors - weirdness > > There was a bug that caused anchors defined from sub-anchors with "load > anchor" statements to get defined directly in the root, and not relative > to the position of the anchor defining them. This was fixed in OpenBSD > just a couple of weeks ago with > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/pf_table.c.diff?r1=1.67&r2=1.68&f=h > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sbin/pfctl/parse.y.diff?r1=1.497&r2=1.498&f=h > > This isn't in FreeBSD (or OpenBSD -stable) yet, but it probably makes > sense to pull it in. > I have use same pf_table.c patch under FreeBSD 6.0, 6.1 two months. It's work well. To Max Laier: please, patch FreeBSD's PF/pfctl. With best regards Boris Polevoy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1FvqPX-000NjB-00.vapcom-mail-ru>