From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 3 22:39:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8725F106564A for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 22:39:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AD18FC0A for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 22:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnp1 with SMTP id p1so13779928ggn.13 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:39:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.244.14 with SMTP id r14mr21239583anh.51.1325630386572; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:39:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o9sm76715312yhk.20.2012.01.03.14.39.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:39:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3THqvz5yD0z2CG5x for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:39:43 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:39:43 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120103173943.5b47afc6@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120102193319.GA31717@hemlock.hydra> References: <4EFF19A7.2060800@ose.nl> <4EFF94CA.3050304@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120101064247.3e8b0b56@scorpio> <4F00580D.1060208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120101091420.117aa8f3@scorpio> <20120102065526.GA16481@hemlock.hydra> <20120102083114.6c09d839@scorpio> <20120102193319.GA31717@hemlock.hydra> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:39:47 -0000 On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:33:20 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: > > Now you have really peaked my interest. On any given day, on a > > Windows based forum, the terms: "FreePiss", open-sore", "Lsuck" > > etcetera are freely thrown around. On Linux based forums, terms > > like: "Winblows", "Microsucks", etcetera are freely used. Would you > > please be so kind as to explain to me why it is morally correct to > > use one set of terms but not the other? It is either right or it is > > wrong. You cannot be slightly pregnant. I personally find such > > terms morally repugnant; however, since they are commonly used on > > this forum it appears that they are socially acceptable. Would you > > not concur or are you going to try and bullshit your way out of > > this one? > > 1. I didn't say it was "morally correct" to use one set of derogatory > forms and "morally incorrect" to use the other. You are attributing > arguments to me I never made. I just spent a half hour rereading every post on this thread to see if I had inadvertently stated that you had stated in any way that it was "morally correct". Guess what, there aren't any such statements. Neither did I make a claim that you supported such actions. I never attributed any such remarks to you. I simple asked for you to explain why it would be morally correct to do so. Your reading comprehensive skills are seriously lacking. The fact that you would spend time to defend yourself against a non-existent claim totally amazes me. Seriously, have you ever been diagnosed with paranoia?