From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Aug 18 16:19:14 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id QAA29839
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 16:19:14 -0700
Received: from gdwest.gd.com ([134.120.3.2])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA29833
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 16:19:12 -0700
Received: by gdwest.gd.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA11148; Fri, 18 Aug 95 16:20:13 PDT
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 95 16:20:13 PDT
From: eyfarris@gdwest.gd.com (Eblan Y Farris)
Message-Id: <9508182320.AA11148@gdwest.gd.com>
To: terry@cs.weber.edu, ugen@latte.worldbank.org
Subject: Re: Dual Pentiums
Cc: chris@crow.ctc.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kallio@jyu.fi,
        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

The Dual Pentium is a neat issue, especially at 133MHz.

Most motherboard co's will shy away from the Dual 133's
and only support Dual 100's.

There have been at least two versions of P133, the first
did not support the Dual Configuration.

efarris@surfusa.com