From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 12 08:57:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2564C92 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.helenius.fi (mail.helenius.fi [IPv6:2001:67c:164:40::91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6EA2D01 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.helenius.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.helenius.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A7383D8; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:57:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at helenius.fi Received: from mail.helenius.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.helenius.fi (mail.helenius.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MS5F0pur9WEz; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.5.129] (a91-156-75-2.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.156.75.2]) (Authenticated sender: pete) by mail.helenius.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3FD9B83C4; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: l2arc compression leak From: Petri Helenius In-Reply-To: <9E818A41-AEF6-4600-B12B-0539EE521B60@helenius.fi> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:56:57 +0300 Message-Id: <67C69A52-C72B-482F-B4ED-CB2B9D6372C2@helenius.fi> References: <5AD0B5C0-7C72-46FA-86D3-7AFA8FA1E84E@helenius.fi> <9E818A41-AEF6-4600-B12B-0539EE521B60@helenius.fi> To: krad X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 Cc: developer@open-zfs.org, "" X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:57:11 -0000 Would it be possible to get this fixed in time for 10.1-release? Pete On 03 Jul 2014, at 14:55 , Petri Helenius wrote: >=20 > Anyone know if this is fixed in the recent ZFS commits? >=20 > Pete >=20 > On 17 Jun 2014, at 11:24 , Petri Helenius wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> I wonder when this makes it to HEAD? >>=20 >> Pete >>=20 >> On 17 Jun 2014, at 10:04 , krad wrote: >>=20 >>> thats really a decision for you as your situation is specific to = you, and you get hit with the penalties if anything goes wrong. If its = causing you a major problem in production and the risk/benfit ratio is = worth it you could use it, but I would make sure you do rigorous testing = first. However if you dont have a specific issue, i would hold off until = its in stable at least. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On 16 June 2014 07:40, Petri Helenius wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> Recent FreeBSD 10-STABLE seems to be suffering from the L2ARC memory = leak, eventually hanging on pfault. >>>=20 >>> Should I apply this patch >>> http://lists.open-zfs.org/pipermail/developer/2014-March/000535.html >>>=20 >>> or wait for integration to SVN? >>>=20 >>> Pete >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>=20 >>=20 >=20