From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Feb 14 02:07:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE2A14E1DD0 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 02:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jtubnor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f54.google.com (mail-ot1-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5230D8886A for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 02:07:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jtubnor@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f54.google.com with SMTP id m1so7959288otf.5 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:07:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8tDxnHoV9Kq/yya63u4ckWIylLz9TGlAG/TxOCUvJD4=; b=G33jqvyJS1VoICVA71m0/WrGyip/GGWH4FFc1KvDpW2HHlts256M1ps5IBq7EN3+an udVzXejwQTB8tS45PXW8W/xMX5W0XCbNmldh3um1Qs+O4WOxwzSjE0/VppR6qZ/p4nwO uPIy1F03bpsSKoxritcyBrHA94Q+cnEf1qQc81DQJtDFez3YxOwP1gU6mBlk6KDEdXx5 T4mdGm7TpHk65qPkGqHsqH3omcDeyRR9H8KkBBwjP4uY1GpZ+QFbfZxMQ4mLwc7A/BSU 54hVxtgWQ7HtepnQ6lV1J6XKA8265vVIfStH4Vk/j5t5z3HgWEe/TJ9GVz+BjpRKVr5/ DSzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZ1TRDyaEPU2mcQ9xqHvnQBUr8wA99DChFW6SFRJlGXx6TYtcbG FSBniYnbjQTQf3I5RKSXB8ZrBB1FkCOHhMFI9vT1kg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbPJQd9SbcBJuuSshABzx52N/li8l7fUqS21b9cpQ12XDXDobPBnFda+/v26j75qITvyGoJAPXXF+jFjpiyBD8= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6d04:: with SMTP id o4mr676746otp.243.1550108606553; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:43:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <80937c57-7757-3c70-5198-4da12c4f23d9@denninger.net> <20190213134939.GO2748@home.opsec.eu> <29563d3e-608d-591e-89bb-bf428b52bdc8@denninger.net> In-Reply-To: <29563d3e-608d-591e-89bb-bf428b52bdc8@denninger.net> From: Jason Tubnor Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:43:14 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Binary update to -STABLE? And if so, what do I get? To: Karl Denninger Cc: freebsd-stable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5230D8886A X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jtubnor@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jtubnor@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; IP_SCORE(-1.22)[ip: (-0.29), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.77), asn: 15169(-1.98), country: US(-0.07)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tubnor.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[54.210.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.73)[-0.735,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[jason@tubnor.net,jtubnor@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[54.210.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[jason@tubnor.net,jtubnor@gmail.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 02:07:36 -0000 On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 00:53, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > You can't. Either wait until a 12.0 with the fix included or > > 12.1 is released, or you fetch the source with the fix included, > > and build from source. > Got it -- thanks. Wait it shall be. > > > I also have hit this IPv6 issue (I thought I was going crazy until I worked it out) and other iflib issues in 12.0, which have been fixed in -STABLE that really should be patched in 12.0 or bring forward an early 12.1 release. For our use case, 12.0 is just too buggy for production at this rate and we won't touch it, which is a shame because there is a lot of good work in there that we would like to use but it is trumped by the breakages.