Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:43:14 +1100 From: Jason Tubnor <jason@tubnor.net> To: Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Binary update to -STABLE? And if so, what do I get? Message-ID: <CACLnyCJByvrahyk1MBdckRxpXw3-GVXDM5WMMTUUmaJRffdqmg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <29563d3e-608d-591e-89bb-bf428b52bdc8@denninger.net> References: <80937c57-7757-3c70-5198-4da12c4f23d9@denninger.net> <20190213134939.GO2748@home.opsec.eu> <29563d3e-608d-591e-89bb-bf428b52bdc8@denninger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 00:53, Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> wrote: > > > You can't. Either wait until a 12.0 with the fix included or > > 12.1 is released, or you fetch the source with the fix included, > > and build from source. > Got it -- thanks. Wait it shall be. > > > I also have hit this IPv6 issue (I thought I was going crazy until I worked it out) and other iflib issues in 12.0, which have been fixed in -STABLE that really should be patched in 12.0 or bring forward an early 12.1 release. For our use case, 12.0 is just too buggy for production at this rate and we won't touch it, which is a shame because there is a lot of good work in there that we would like to use but it is trumped by the breakages.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACLnyCJByvrahyk1MBdckRxpXw3-GVXDM5WMMTUUmaJRffdqmg>