Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 15:22:39 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209628] freebsd-update upgrade broken in jail Message-ID: <bug-209628-227-bXtDf0YzFh@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-209628-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-209628-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209628 --- Comment #5 from Leif Pedersen <leif@ofWilsonCreek.com> --- I guess I don't see the point of examining sysctl or branching differently = when in a jail. There's actually no need for `freebsd-update` to be aware of jai= ls at all, nor be aware of the currently running kernel. The whole point of `freebsd-version` is to indicate what is currently installed, be it in a ja= il or not, which is exactly what `freebsd-update` needs. The command `UNAME_r=3D$(freebsd-version) freebsd-update` works in all case= s I'm aware of. `freebsd-update` just needs to be changed to default to it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-209628-227-bXtDf0YzFh>