From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Dec 15 19:27:35 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA10682
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 19:27:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA10675
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 19:27:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.v-site.net (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA07843; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 19:27:10 -0800
Message-Id: <199512160327.TAA07843@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: rah.star-gate.com: Host localhost.v-site.net didn't use HELO protocol
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Stephen Hocking <sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Realaudio Server for FreeBSD 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:23:51 GMT."
             <199512150023.AAA03049@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 19:27:10 -0800
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Wow ,  NAS already has support for data compression/decompression and 
can work at low bitstreams say less than 28.8 kilobits/second?

Great where can I pick up the code ? 8)


On a different note, we should not be blasting commercial products is up to 
them to stand up against the competition.

	Enjoy,
	Amancio


>>> Stephen Hocking said:
 > 
 > >>After some fussing around with the RealAudio people, they eventually told 
     me=20
 > >>last month there would be a port of the RealAudio server for FreeBSD machi
     nes.
 > >>It was with great joy I found out at their web page that it was coming ind
     eed
 > >>for version 2.0... This is good news, since the old BSDi version didn't du
     mped
 > >>core under the compatibility mode...
 > >>
 > >>Just though someone would be happy to know this :-) I know I am...
 > >>
 > 
 > 	Of course, NAS is functionally equivalent as far as I can work out,
 > and is already available for a number of platforms including FreeBSD & Linux
     .
 > Why bother?
 > 
 > 
 > 	Stephen
 >