From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Mar  3 17:22:11 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA11957
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:22:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA11933;
          Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:22:04 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA13640; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:21:12 -0800 (PST)
To: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>,
        sthaug@nethelp.no, dannyman@sasquatch.dannyland.org,
        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Fund 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Mar 1998 16:00:30 PST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.96.980303155247.12911D-100000@shell.uniserve.com> 
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 17:21:11 -0800
Message-ID: <13636.888974471@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>   Basically, this is a no-brainer.  It costs companies money to maintain
> FreeBSD.  Basically this is "make buildworld" and/or "make release" on
> some type of development machine, then then "make installworld" on every
> server (once it is tested).  How many organizations are doing this now?
> Imagine the duplication of effort.  These same companies could give
> FreeBSD Inc $200/yr (or more) and save a LOT of money.

It sounds a lot like the bindist from a SNAP CD to me. :-)

					Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message