Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:26:51 +0200
From:      Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
Message-ID:  <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok@webmail.leidinger.net>
In-Reply-To: <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <451AE27F.3010506@samsco.org> <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 -0400):

> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past.  Only
> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level.  I'd still say leave nfs and ufs
> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra isofs
> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point.

I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are  
cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed.

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
Vegeterians beware!  You are what you eat.

http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok>