From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Feb 27 17:48:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from m3.cs.berkeley.edu (m3.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA8E37B78A; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:48:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca1-183.ix.netcom.com [209.109.232.183]) by m3.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA07772; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:48:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id RAA76481; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:48:03 -0800 (PST) To: Doug Barton Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: QUICK RESPONCE NEEDED: Netscape 4.72 handling References: <20000227113708.A18632@dragon.nuxi.com> <38B9950A.2A0A13@gorean.org> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 27 Feb 2000 17:48:00 -0800 In-Reply-To: Doug Barton's message of "Sun, 27 Feb 2000 13:20:10 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Doug Barton * David O'Brien wrote: * > * > Hi Satoshi, * > * > I'd like to update Netscape offering on the DEC Alpha to version 4.72. * > Should I do this upgrade in as the netscape47-* ports, or do we need to * > repo copy netscape47-* to netscape472-* ? Personally, I see 4.72 as a * > minor update to 4.7 and would just assume keep the port names the same. An update is fine. The version number seems to indicate it's just a minor upgrade. * Personally I think we should eliminate all of the netscapeN* ports. I * don't see any reason to keep the really old versions. Some people like/need small memory footprints. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message