Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 00:16:52 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: clefevre@citeweb.net Cc: Akbar <Akbar@Aptitude.com.sg>, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wats so special about freeBSD? Message-ID: <20000920001652.U66839@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <200009191942.e8JJgMc03338@gits.dyndns.org>; from root@gits.dyndns.org on Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:42:20PM %2B0200 References: <89731E9AF92BD411869200D0B71BB4DC0FC297@ASERVER> <200009191942.e8JJgMc03338@gits.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:42:20PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> > am seeking out a career in security area and i am seriously thinking of
> > learning 1 unix based OS. and i am stuck. which one would be best to learn??
>
> for security purpose, OpenBSD is well suitable.
just curious:
Do you say this just because everyone says "well, FreeBSD is stable/performance,
OpenBSD is security oriented, NetBSD is portable", because OpenBSD markets themselves
towards security, or based on an independent thought?
Every BSD has its strong point, but I wish people would elaborate more then
*grunt*grunt* OpenBSD for security *grunt*grunt*
</rant>
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000920001652.U66839>