From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 16:01:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245D716A418 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26C413C4E7 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0OG1LP7074698; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:01:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4798B651.7000108@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:01:21 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <4797B923.6030400@gmail.com> <86odbbwo02.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86odbbwo02.fsf@ds4.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:01:22 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.4 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: EchoB , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XEN and ZFS Status? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:01:29 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > EchoB writes: >> Hi all :) Can anyone point me in the direction of any detailed docs or >> perhaps just an answer on here re: production status of Xen and ZFS >> when 7.0 is released? I have read somewhere that ZFS is experimental >> at best, and wanted to confirm that. Also, using Xen would be a great >> plus in a production environment. > > I use ZFS in production. > > Xen is currently not supported at all, AFAIK. > Would it be possible to have any more completely uninformed opinions on Xen by people completely out of the loop on its development? Scott