From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 15:13:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB0F37B401; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:13:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598E943F75; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:13:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0303.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.199.48] helo=mindspring.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 190rPk-0003DN-00; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 15:13:04 -0800 Message-ID: <3E8B6E1E.F8E1B73A@mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 15:11:26 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juli Mallett References: <3E8B03E6.36871704@mindspring.com> <20030402152516.J64602-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> <20030402143527.A96165@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a42587ce21ee35e74cb23f23bb656753d42601a10902912494350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: Robert Watson cc: Jeff Roberson cc: csujun@21cn.com cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: libthr and 1:1 threading. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 23:13:08 -0000 Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Jeff Roberson [ Data: 2003-04-02 ] > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Also, any ETA on the per process signal mask handing bug in > > > libthr? Might not be safe to convert everything up front, in > > > a rush of eager enthusiasm... > > > > Which bug is that? I'm not aware of it. > > I think Terry is referring to the Uncertainty & Doubt as if it were > a bug over the lack of a process sigmask (moved into the threads), > as raised by the M:N group. Yes. This is the issue in question. -- Terry