From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 28 12:22:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0C837B42C for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e7SJJW616137; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:19:32 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Chris Cc: Steve Lewis , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Scaling Apache? Message-ID: <20000828121932.E1209@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20000828114314.Y1209@fw.wintelcom.net> <20000828150743.D4912@daemon.kingsqueak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <20000828150743.D4912@daemon.kingsqueak.org>; from kingsqueak@kingsqueak.org on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 03:07:43PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:03:41PM -0700, Steve Lewis wrote: > > keeps request overhead lower (logging and caching tricks) but the > > trade-offs in server-side scripting support could kill that. > > > > Does anyone know of a good FAQ or other resource on load balancing with > > apache? * Chris [000828 12:07] wrote: > Look into an Alteon 180e or similar hardware solution...makes this truly > simple to do...want another server...sure just add it to the VIP and off > it goes. And because of the VIP they can all have the same > hostname...makes server replication even simpler Then again one might want to investigate a server solution that could cut hardware and space costs by a factor of 2 at least. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message