From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 15 12:10:55 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89761065673
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:10:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
	[IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A865A8FC1A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:10:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBFCAmQc053495;
	Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:10:48 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id
	mBFCAmaQ053492; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:10:48 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:10:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: prad <prad@towardsfreedom.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081214230425.68dfd5e7@gom.home>
Message-ID: <20081215130946.L53356@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <4942B6A3.504@gmail.com>
	<18754.48923.616173.319215@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
	<20081212205614.GB37185@kokopelli.hydra>
	<31371229120906@webmail12.yandex.ru> <87iqppdlzh.fsf@kobe.laptop>
	<20081213002037.F5665@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20081213092104.GC39031@kokopelli.hydra>
	<20081213103054.B8893@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20081213194302.GA51063@kokopelli.hydra>
	<20081213122621.001352ad@gom.home>
	<20081215061228.GE5527@kokopelli.hydra>
	<20081214230425.68dfd5e7@gom.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:10:56 -0000

> i don't think that has to happen at all.
>
> personally i think self-moderation is best, followed by moderation
> (which i haven't found to be a bad thing).
>
> here the former seems to be dominant because of the quality of people
> on the list, so it is quite sufficient.

this quality gets down. not because lots of smart people get dumber, but 
because lots of new people comes, mostly those who "heard" about FreeBSD 
being better than windows etc..