From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 9 07:26:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266D616A41B for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:26:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it) Received: from insomma.datacode.it (ip-174-86.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.174.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD2A43D70 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:26:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it) Received: from localhost (localhost.datacode.it [127.0.0.1]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with SMTP id 40A4B2C90B for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:26:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from insomma.datacode.it (localhost.datacode.it [127.0.0.1]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7771B2C90A for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from massimo.datacode.it (massimo.datacode.it [192.168.1.13]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367EC2C906 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:26:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Massimo Lusetti To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200606090709.k5979fQ9020571@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200606090709.k5979fQ9020571@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CEDOC - Modena Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:26:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1149837981.4303.3.camel@massimo.datacode.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: Re: 6.1-R ? 6-Stable ? 5.5-R ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:26:25 -0000 On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 09:09 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > No, I meant RELENG_6_1, which is the security fix branch > for 6.1-Release. Albert wrote that he would prefer not > to use RELENG_6 (a.k.a. "6-stable") on a production machine, > therefore my recommendation is RELENG_6_1. If read right he is already running a RELENG_6. > Of course, there might be good reasons to run RELENG_6 > anyway, in case that significant NFS fixes have gone in > after the release (which I'm not aware of). But that > decision is up to Albert himself. Actually if i remember right the NFS fix are gone in the RELENG_6 and not in RELENG_6_1 Regards -- Massimo.run();