From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Feb 25 18:28:52 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id SAA18616 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 25 Feb 1995 18:28:52 -0800
Received: from is1.hk.super.net (jbeukema@is1.hk.super.net [202.14.67.232]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA18607 for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 1995 18:28:47 -0800
Received: by is1.hk.super.net id AA05883
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org); Sun, 26 Feb 1995 10:27:38 +0800
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 1995 10:27:37 +0800 (HKT)
From: John Beukema <jbeukema@hk.super.net>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@cs.weber.edu>
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>, ernie@tinny.eis.net.au,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD
In-Reply-To: <9502252123.AA01078@cs.weber.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950226102510.5089A-100000@is1.hk.super.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Sat, 25 Feb 1995, Terry Lambert wrote:
> 
> To not maintain binary compatability *including* shared images would
> be folly.
> 

Bravo! I agree completely.  We do not need one more fragmented, 
incompatible flavour.

jbeukema