From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 18:47:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2CF14B33F4 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD257126B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 497F214B33F0; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C8A14B33EF for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C174971226 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF126AEF7 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0LIlKOB029352 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:47:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x0LIlKx6029351 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:47:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235050] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel: take maintainership Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:47:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Rejected X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:47:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235050 Jan Beich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Rejected --- Comment #2 from Jan Beich --- If you can manage on your own then fine. No need to be rude. (In reply to Johannes Lundberg from comment #1) > Graphics work is a team effort. Why the badge color is so important? I have no trouble working together with others e.g., bug 221540 + bug 222175. Unfortunately, every time I've tried = to engage the graphics team they've pushed me back. Sometimes the pushback resulted in rubberstamp but that's barely better than no review. > Someone playing solo on the sidelines I've filed bugs, asked for testing and provided feedback for others. Was th= at a mistake? > How about co-operating with the team instead I've asked for review, often weeks in advance to get the maintainer more ti= me. Was that a mistake? > so we can make productive, positive changes What if you don't e.g., when repeatedly promising to review later? > improving your attitude towards fellow community members. Thanks, I know it could be better. When are you going to stop treating "maintainer timeout" as an attack on the team? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=